gs4
150 Words10 Marks
Q.“Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right violation.” Examine the statement with reference to ethical dimension being violated by the nation claiming to be democratic with open society.
UPSC Mains 2021•International Relations
Model Answer
Syllabus Point
- Ethical Issues in International Relations and Funding
Approach
- Introduction (Definition) (30-40 words)
- Introduce the state of refugees with stats and reports like by UNHCR.
- Body (Explanation) (80-90 words)
- Discuss Ethical Dimensions concerned in turning back refugees
- Discuss the Reasons why open and democratic nations turn back refugees
- Conclusion (20 words)
- Emphasise on the fact that while economic and security concerns are valid, turning away persecuted individuals contradicts the core principles of human rights, justice, and global solidarity. A balanced policy approach is needed to integrate refugees while safeguarding national interests.
Introduction
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), a refugee is an individual forced to flee their home country due to fear of persecution, conflict, or systemic violence. UNHCR reports indicated that by the end of 2021, global refugee figures had reached approximately 26.4 million.
graph TD
subgraph EP["Ethical Principles"]
MO["Moral obligations"]
HP["Humanitarianism principle"]
NRP["Non-refoulement principle"]
end
subgraph NC["National Concerns"]
PC["Political concerns"]
EC["Economic concerns"]
SC["Security concerns"]
LC["Legal concerns"]
end
EP --- Scale((("Balancing Scale"))) --- NCBody Analysis
Ethical Dimensions concerned in turning back refugees:
- Violation of Non-Refoulement: Turning back refugees directly violates the core international ethical and legal principle of non-refoulement, which strictly prohibits returning individuals to territories where their lives or freedoms are threatened.
- Undermining Democratic Values: When liberal democracies deny asylum seekers, they compromise the foundational values of liberty and human rights they claim to champion, contributing to global humanitarian crises.
- Breach of Humanitarianism: Humanitarianism dictates a moral obligation to alleviate human suffering. Prioritizing narrow national self-interest over the survival of vulnerable populations represents a failure of this ethical duty.
- Severe Human Consequences: Forcing refugees back often leaves them stranded in highly dangerous, life-threatening conditions or in transit zones devoid of basic human rights and legal protections.
- Failure of Global Moral Obligation: Democratic nations, as prominent members of the international community, have a collective moral duty to support global human rights. Turning away refugees represents a failure to uphold this global responsibility.
graph TD
R["Refugees"]
R --> Allow
R --> Cant["Can't Allow"]
subgraph Allow["Allow"]
H["Humanitarian"]
C["Compassion"]
L["Liberalism"]
Co["Cosmopolitanism"]
end
subgraph Cant["Can't Allow"]
Re["Realism"]
Cf["Conflicts"]
DS["Domestic Strain"]
endReasons why open and democratic nations turn back refugees:
- Security concerns: Nations often perceive large refugee inflows as potential security risks, fearing infiltration by hostile elements. For example, the US historically suspended certain refugee programs citing national security interests.
- Economic concerns: Host nations worry about the economic strain on public services, welfare systems, and local job markets. Countries like the UK and Australia have tightened immigration rules citing economic preservation.
- Political concerns: Domestic political pressures and the rise of populist sentiments often push governments to restrict refugee entry to appease electorates or guard national sovereignty, as seen in Hungary's border policies.
- Legal concerns: States may argue that asylum seekers do not meet specific legal criteria. For instance, the EU's Dublin Regulation mandates that refugees seek asylum in their first country of arrival, leading to disproportionate pressure on border nations like Greece and Italy.
Conclusion
While domestic security and economic stability are legitimate concerns, turning away persecuted individuals directly contradicts the ethical pillars of human rights and justice. Democratic nations must collaborate with international bodies to formulate balanced policies that offer compassionate refuge while addressing domestic concerns and the root causes of displacement.
Previous QuestionAn elevated corridor is being constructed to reduce traffic congestion in the capital of a particular state. You have been selected as project manager of this prestigious project on your professional competence and experience. The deadline is to complete the project in the next two years by 30 June 2021, since the project is to be inaugurated by the Chief Minister before the elections are announced in the second week of July 2021. While carrying out the surprise inspection by the inspecting team, a minor crack was noticed in one of the piers of the elevated corridor possibly due to poor material used. You immediately informed the chief engineer and stopped further work. It was assessed by you that a minimum of three piers of the elevated corridor have to be demolished and reconstructed. But this process will delay the project minimum by four to six months. But the chief engineer overruled the observation of the inspecting team on the ground that it was a minor crack that will not in any way impact the strength and durability of the bridge. He ordered you to overlook the observation of the inspecting team and continue working with the same speed and tempo. He informed you that the minister does not want any delay as he wants the Chief Minister to inaugurate the elevated corridor before the elections are declared. Also informed you that the contractor is a far relative of the minister and he wants him to finish the project. He also gave you a hint that your further promotion as an additional chief engineer is under consideration by the ministry. However, you strongly felt that the minor crack in the pier in the elevated corridor will adversely affect the health and life of the bridge and therefore it will be very dangerous not to repair the elevated corridor.
A. Under the given conditions, what are the options available to you as a project manager?
B. What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by the project manager and his response to overcome such challenges?
C. What are the professional challenges likely to be faced by the project manager and his response to overcome such challenges?
D. What can be the consequences of overlooking the observation raised by the inspecting team?
Next Question”Life doesn’t make any sense without interdependence. We need each other, and the sooner we learn that, it is better for us all.” - Erik Erikson